Just an appendix to yesterday's first entry. Fundamentalist Christian ministries and organizations claiming that homosexuals need 'curing' and that they can be 'cured' through faith and prayer, have been around for a while. But as with so many other things, the gap between their galloping optimism and the reality, is a wide one. Take Exodus International, which seeks to convert homosexuals, both religiously and behaviorally. Three years after it started, two of its original founders 'reverted'. In 2000 its long-term chairman, John Paulk, was removed for 'engaging in behavior which has negatively impacted on the credibility of Exodus'; which is another way of saying that he had been caught visiting gay bars. In the 1990's in the US a man named Michael Johnston, who was HIV positive, was widely promoted by the American Family Association as a sterling example of a homosexual 'transformed by the Lord'. He spoke widely on radio and TV and in churches. In 2002 it was revealed that he had been having unprotected sex with other males. Another Christian ministry called Love In Action started in 1973 by Frank Worthen, John Evans, and Kent Philpott, claimed that homosexuals could become heterosexual if only they would pray hard enough. McIntyre eventually committed suicide in despair over his inability to change and Evans left the project and denounced it as dangerous. He was quoted as saying: 'They're destroying people's lives. If you don't do their thing, you're not of God, you'll go to hell. They're living in a fantasy world'. The third of the three founders, Kent Philpott, wrote a book called The Third Sex? in which he claimed that he had 'cured' hundreds of gays. Some of these 'cured' gays, including Evans, filed a suit against Philpott for misrepresentation (i.e. lying) and he was forced to remove his book from the market. Until 2006 Pastor Ted Haggard was head of the 14,000 member congregation New Life Church in Colorado in the US, and leader of the powerful National Association of Evangelicals. He was also well-known for his strong condemnation of homosexuality. In 2006 Haggard was forced to resign when confronted with evidence that he had been taking drugs and engaging in sex with other men. A year later Haggard announced that he had been 'completely cured through the Lord's grace' and almost immediately new evidence emerged of his homosexual behavior.
One's first reaction to these and numerous similar incidents, might be to dismiss them as just more examples of psalm-singing evangelical Christian hypocrisy. But they have another dimension, a genuinely sad and tragic one. Because of old prejudices and misunderstandings, homosexuals are from the very beginning up against some very difficult odds. Fortunately, due to better understanding and the work of organizations like AWARE, a young homosexual's chances of overcoming these odds and gaining self-acceptance and self-respect are much better today. But if he or she happens to have a spiritual yearning and if, due to their upbringing or cultural milieu or because access to information about different religions is limbed, they become a Christian, they will be forced by their church's teachings to re-adopt all the negativities they had just overcame - pretense, shame, denial, self-loathing, secretiveness, etc. If they confess their homosexuality they will either be asked to leave their church or have to undergo endless sessions of quack 'conversion therapy' until they are judged 'normal'. Both options are a lingering remnant of the cruel victimization of the past. People like Michael Johnston and Pastor Ted Haggard are not so much hypocrites as victims.
A quick check through the internet found that these are just some of the professional organizations in the US that consider homosexuality to be normal and which consider 'conversion therapy' to be ineffective or even harmful - the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Assn, the American Counseling Assn, The National Assn of Social Workers, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Assn of School Administrators, the American Federation of Teachers, National Assn of School Psychologists and the National Education Association. Similar medical and psychological organizations in other Western countries take the same stance. But of course, none of this cuts any ice with the evangelicals; to them all it does is prove that these organizations are under the influence of Satan. Welcome to the new Middle Ages!
The priests and pastors who deplore homosexual promiscuity and hedonism are actually partly responsible for it. Deprive a person of the spiritual sustenance and comfort, tell them that the feelings they have are perverted and sick, strongly advocate laws that stigmatize them as criminals, do everything you can to prevent them from forming legally recognized partnerships, tell them that they will go to hell when they die, and is it a wonder that they reject religion and turn to superficial, self-destructive lifestyles?
The phenomena of forcing your moral principles on others and then have it create all sorts of problems, has, sad to say, a long sorry history in Christianity. Take prohibition for example. In the late 19th century American Christians were starting to flex their political muscle. High on their agenda for making society more 'decent' was banning alcohol – not encouraging abstinence, not educating people to drink responsibly, that would have taken too much effort - banning it outright! As a Buddhist, I don't drink and I have never have - I don't like it. But I wouldn't try to stop my neighbor from drinking and I would never speak to him about abstaining, unless his drinking was having some negative impact on me. But evangelicals aren't like Buddhists, they want to force their beliefs and practices on everyone else, even by using the law if necessary. Spearheaded by the Woman's Christian Temperance Union, the prohibitionists finally got the Volstead Act passes in 1920 and all alcohol was banned. The supporters of prohibition were all the usual suspects, most Protestant sects but also the Quakers and those upholders of moral decency the Ku Klux Klan. Opponents were the wise and sagacious Woodrow Wilson who tried to veto the Congress ratification of the Volstead Act, the Episcopalians, the Catholics and most of the medical profession.
The consequences of prohibition were disastrous. The millions of ordinary people who liked an occasional drink resented having what they saw as their rights restricted, alcohol consumption sored, as did drunkenness and all the problems that go with it. In 1925 there was more speakeasies (illegal bars) in New York (as many as 100,000) than there had been legal bars in 1919. The police wasted millions of man-hours ferreting out illegal booze, prosecuting otherwise law-abiding citizens, and trying to stop liquor smuggling. The mafia could hardly believe their luck. The price of bootleg liquor skyrocketed, they made hundreds of millions of dollars and with that loot established themselves, for the first time, as a potent force in American life. Prohibition was called 'the Noble Experiment' in that while it was a complete failure, those who advocated it had 'good intentions'. But good intentions aren't sufficient; intentions also have to be thoughtful and well-informed, they have to take into account existing realities, and they have to be guided by accurate information not what ancient books say. The 'well intentioned' prohibitionists were nowhere to be seen when the Volstead Act was finally repealed in 1931, as people danced in the streets and celebrated by getting uproariously drunk.
The fundamentalist Christian approach to homosexuality is similar; perhaps well-intentioned but ill-informed, responsible for causing heartbreak, confusion and suffering, and doomed to failure.
People occasionally inform me that they are homosexual and ask me what the Buddhist stand on this issue is (see my blog of 25th May 2008). With one exception (a man who had very obvious and serious personality problems) all these people struck me as perfectly normal and average. Most of them appeared to have a distinct spiritual leaning, a genuine desire to practice the Dhamma and a determination to live by the Precepts. Several have been members of our society and the ones who still are have been good, helpful and supportive members.
The picture above shows Pastor Ted Haggard reading the Bible while pretending to be heterosexual.
One's first reaction to these and numerous similar incidents, might be to dismiss them as just more examples of psalm-singing evangelical Christian hypocrisy. But they have another dimension, a genuinely sad and tragic one. Because of old prejudices and misunderstandings, homosexuals are from the very beginning up against some very difficult odds. Fortunately, due to better understanding and the work of organizations like AWARE, a young homosexual's chances of overcoming these odds and gaining self-acceptance and self-respect are much better today. But if he or she happens to have a spiritual yearning and if, due to their upbringing or cultural milieu or because access to information about different religions is limbed, they become a Christian, they will be forced by their church's teachings to re-adopt all the negativities they had just overcame - pretense, shame, denial, self-loathing, secretiveness, etc. If they confess their homosexuality they will either be asked to leave their church or have to undergo endless sessions of quack 'conversion therapy' until they are judged 'normal'. Both options are a lingering remnant of the cruel victimization of the past. People like Michael Johnston and Pastor Ted Haggard are not so much hypocrites as victims.
A quick check through the internet found that these are just some of the professional organizations in the US that consider homosexuality to be normal and which consider 'conversion therapy' to be ineffective or even harmful - the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Assn, the American Counseling Assn, The National Assn of Social Workers, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Assn of School Administrators, the American Federation of Teachers, National Assn of School Psychologists and the National Education Association. Similar medical and psychological organizations in other Western countries take the same stance. But of course, none of this cuts any ice with the evangelicals; to them all it does is prove that these organizations are under the influence of Satan. Welcome to the new Middle Ages!
The priests and pastors who deplore homosexual promiscuity and hedonism are actually partly responsible for it. Deprive a person of the spiritual sustenance and comfort, tell them that the feelings they have are perverted and sick, strongly advocate laws that stigmatize them as criminals, do everything you can to prevent them from forming legally recognized partnerships, tell them that they will go to hell when they die, and is it a wonder that they reject religion and turn to superficial, self-destructive lifestyles?
The phenomena of forcing your moral principles on others and then have it create all sorts of problems, has, sad to say, a long sorry history in Christianity. Take prohibition for example. In the late 19th century American Christians were starting to flex their political muscle. High on their agenda for making society more 'decent' was banning alcohol – not encouraging abstinence, not educating people to drink responsibly, that would have taken too much effort - banning it outright! As a Buddhist, I don't drink and I have never have - I don't like it. But I wouldn't try to stop my neighbor from drinking and I would never speak to him about abstaining, unless his drinking was having some negative impact on me. But evangelicals aren't like Buddhists, they want to force their beliefs and practices on everyone else, even by using the law if necessary. Spearheaded by the Woman's Christian Temperance Union, the prohibitionists finally got the Volstead Act passes in 1920 and all alcohol was banned. The supporters of prohibition were all the usual suspects, most Protestant sects but also the Quakers and those upholders of moral decency the Ku Klux Klan. Opponents were the wise and sagacious Woodrow Wilson who tried to veto the Congress ratification of the Volstead Act, the Episcopalians, the Catholics and most of the medical profession.
The consequences of prohibition were disastrous. The millions of ordinary people who liked an occasional drink resented having what they saw as their rights restricted, alcohol consumption sored, as did drunkenness and all the problems that go with it. In 1925 there was more speakeasies (illegal bars) in New York (as many as 100,000) than there had been legal bars in 1919. The police wasted millions of man-hours ferreting out illegal booze, prosecuting otherwise law-abiding citizens, and trying to stop liquor smuggling. The mafia could hardly believe their luck. The price of bootleg liquor skyrocketed, they made hundreds of millions of dollars and with that loot established themselves, for the first time, as a potent force in American life. Prohibition was called 'the Noble Experiment' in that while it was a complete failure, those who advocated it had 'good intentions'. But good intentions aren't sufficient; intentions also have to be thoughtful and well-informed, they have to take into account existing realities, and they have to be guided by accurate information not what ancient books say. The 'well intentioned' prohibitionists were nowhere to be seen when the Volstead Act was finally repealed in 1931, as people danced in the streets and celebrated by getting uproariously drunk.
The fundamentalist Christian approach to homosexuality is similar; perhaps well-intentioned but ill-informed, responsible for causing heartbreak, confusion and suffering, and doomed to failure.
People occasionally inform me that they are homosexual and ask me what the Buddhist stand on this issue is (see my blog of 25th May 2008). With one exception (a man who had very obvious and serious personality problems) all these people struck me as perfectly normal and average. Most of them appeared to have a distinct spiritual leaning, a genuine desire to practice the Dhamma and a determination to live by the Precepts. Several have been members of our society and the ones who still are have been good, helpful and supportive members.
The picture above shows Pastor Ted Haggard reading the Bible while pretending to be heterosexual.
Hi Venenerable,
ReplyDeleteJust wonder, what is Buddhist's view on drinking and homosexuality then?
I suppose drinking in the fifth precept?
I have a friend who, I think, can be classified as alcoholic... Just the mention of "no alcohol" make him mad.... He would rather to die than quit drinking.
This comment is unrelated to the post. Please feel free to delete this.
ReplyDeleteI found an article that might interest you:
The HinduIt is about Phetook Tshering Bhutia, initiated into the monastic life, 63, who is seeking election from Sangha, an unique constituency, one that has no defined boundary except that of the State’s borders, and an electorate of 3058 monks and nuns belonging to the 56 different registered monasteries in Sikkim...
Regards,
Dear Samsara,
ReplyDeletePlease go to www.buddhismatoz.com and look up the subjects you are interested in.
I was doing a search for some old dhamma talks you had given and was delighted to come across this blog, the archives of which I've enjoyed reading over the past few days. Your writings are as thoughtful and engaging as your talks and I find them equally helpful. Thank you
ReplyDeleteNo thanks, however, do I give to the countless, destructive churches, groups, and camps that teach intolerance and encourage ignorance.
I live in small town, Midwestern America (which is why I utilize online Buddhist resources) and am SURROUNDED by this delusional hatred. The Ted Haggard "scandal" was all over U.S media, as he went from one interview to the next parading his wife around to back up his claims of being sexually "cured" by Jesus Christ. Modern miracles....
I read an article not long ago about a camp parents send their homosexually inclined children to to be "cured" (a gay rehab if you will) and one of the activities the youths participate in involves beating their pillow while reciting parts of the bible. By doing so they are "beating" the "gay" out.
An informative, if mild, documentary exploring homosexuality in relation to the condemning passages in the bible was made titled "For the Bible Tells Me So" and can be watched on YouTube in parts if anyone feels they need a fuller understanding of each side of the argument in a digestible form.
Dear Kathleen,
ReplyDeleteThe emiminant medievalist Warren Johnsson has identified what he has called the sodomy delusion, a bizarre craze that developed in the Dark Ages and has persisted with relitivly few changes right up to the present day.I partly quote and paraphrase paraphrase Johnsson's definition of this psychopathological condition.The sodomy delusion is a complex of paranoid beliefs invented and inculcated by the churches to the effect that that non-procreative sexuality in general and sexual acts between males in particular, are contrary to the laws of nature, are a form of madness and are against the will of God, and is practised by individuals whose wills have been enslaved by demonic powers. Furthermore, while heterosexuality is natural, everyone is susceptible of the demonic temptation to commit sodomy. Everyone hates and condemns it, but it is infinity contagious; everyone regards it with disgust, but whoever has done it will have a lifelong craving for it. It is a crime committed by a small handful of depraved individuals, but if not checked by the harshest penelities, it would become rampant and lead to the extinction of the human race.The existence of even a few sodomites within a society causes various natural and social catastrophes and can even threaten civilization itself. For its own self-preservation, every Christian community must be eternally vigilant against its occurrence and spread, and the parties guilty of it must be punished with the utmost severity, if not put to death, in accordance with biblical precepts.
While all the other delusional beliefs promoted by the churches – the existence of witches, attacks by demonic forces, Jeudophobia, the imminent end of the world, etc. - have been discredited and faded away, the sodomy delusion remains, although it is in retreat. Someone should start an organisation to help cure the unhappy, frightened individuals suffering from this complaint.
Dear Bhante,
ReplyDeleteHow optimistic you are!
"While all the other delusional beliefs promoted by the churches – the existence of witches, attacks by demonic forces, Jeudophobia, the imminent end of the world, etc. - have been discredited and faded away, the sodomy delusion remains, although it is in retreat. Someone should start an organisation to help cure the unhappy, frightened individuals suffering from this complaint."
Those pathologies are still to be found in the US-- Sarah Palin, who ran as Senator McCain's vice presidential candidate attends/attended a church in Alaska where victory over witches was the minister's touted accomplishment. Many people fervently believe the end of the world is nigh and, indeed, to be desired (and helped along!) Homophobia is just one more example of medieval ignorance.
With metta,
I try to be optimistic, I really try.
ReplyDeleteDear Venerable,
ReplyDeleteThis whole AWARE affair smells of politics and power mongering. As Buddhists, should we be involved in it?
Whose involved? 'I'm just sittin here watchin the wheels go round' - and making the odd comment.
ReplyDeleteMy apologies. I didn't intend to mean that you are involved.
ReplyDeletebtsivan: On the contrary, we SHOULD be involved - meaning concerned and engaged as this issue is about humanity. We cannot be just looking at our own navels and say I'm Buddhist, I'm fine, I will not get involved! Every issue that threatens our humanity needs our involvement ( e.g. the rise of Nazism has been attributed to the apathy of Germans of that era)- christian fundamentalism is on the rise, the AWARE saga is only the tip of the iceberg.
ReplyDeleteHi Venerable,
ReplyDeleteMay I know what is your email address so that I can write to you? I am a Christian who reads your blog regularly and I too am concerned, in fact very concerned, that the AWARE Saga is only the tip of an iceberg. I wish to communicate with u privately on this matter. (Though not a Buddhist, I have an interest in Buddhism and have been reading Buddhist academic books for years. Not that I am thinking of becoming a Buddhist, but I do find many things I can learn from Buddhism even though at the moment my subjective assessment of probability of worldviews still makes me continue as a Christian)