Reading the suttas is always interesting, in as much
as they show how little we humans have
changed in some ways over the centuries, how little of what we do is actually
new. Recently I was reading the Chaddanta Jataka (Ja.V,45-7). This charming
story is interesting in itself but of extra interest is its detailed description
of a mountain-climbing expedition. Mountain climbing is little more than two
centuries old while rock-climbing has only become a recognized sport/activity
in the last few decades. Reading the Chaddanta Jataka shows that people
were doing both, although not as a
recreation, as far back as the 5th or 3rd century BCE. Very briefly, the Chaddanta
Jataka tells of a man who undertakes to go to a remote mountain wilderness to
kill a miraculous elephant and bring back its tusks for a queen. Knowing that
he will have to ascend extremely difficult mountains he prepares himself well. A
list of the equipment he takes includes a knife (vasi), hatchet (pharasu),
spade (kuddala), a sharp instrument
for cutting bamboo (nikhadanamutthika
velu), grass-cutter (gumbaccheda),
metal rod (lohadanda), iron grappling hooks
(ayasinghataka), pegs or bolts (khanu), hammer (muggara),
leather ropes (cammayotta), webbing (varatta), elephant boots
(hatthiupahana) and most
interestingly, a leather parachute or glider (cammachatta). He also took his own firewood and barley meal, perhaps
a type of energy food. Everything was carried in a leather (waterproof ?) pack
(cammabhasta). The first part of his
journey is taken by chariot, then his porters help carry his gear until he gets
the uninhabited forest after which he proceeded alone. The text describes how
he cuts his way through a thick forest,
improvises a raft out of a log and a ladder (nisseni) out of bamboo to cross
difficult terrain until he reaches the
foot of the mountain. Then tying the rope to the grappling hook he threw it onto the rock, secured it and
began his assent. Using the
diamond-tipped iron rod he drilled holes in the rock, hammered pegs into them
and climbed up on them. On reaching the
first peak he let himself down the other side with the rope, ‘like a spider
letting out its web’ (makkata sutta vissajjana
karena). Getting to a cliff or gorge he waited for ‘a gust of wind and then
taking his parachute (or glider) he glided down like a bird’ (vatan gahapetva sakuno viya otaratiti).
In this way he climbed over six mountain ranges until he got to where the
elephant was. One can only assume that these details, so precise and realistic,
are based on actual mountain climbing expeditions that really took place.
Perhaps they reflect early attempts by Indians to penetrate into the Himalayas
and eventually beyond them to the
Tibetan Plateau.
One final thing. In the
National Museum in New Delhi there is a fragment of the railing from the great
Buddhist stupa at Bharhut dating from about the 2nd century BCE. On it is
a depiction of two men climbing a rock face by grasping and standing on pegs
protruding from the rock. The railing of the Bharhut stupa illustrates numerous
Jataka stories but I have long pondered over which one this scene is ment to
be. The caption below the railing says it shows honey gatherers, which is quite plausible.
Indian villagers and forest-dwellers do gather wild honey still in a way not
unlike the scene on the railing (See
Eric Valli’s Honey Gathers in Nepal).
The problem is that there is no Jataka story which includes an episode of honey
gathering. So I am inclined to think it is meant to illustrate the mountain
climbing episode from the Chaddanta Jataka. There are problems with this
identification. The Jataka tells of one mountaineer but here there are two, and
his pack was made of leather while here the packs look more like cane. Nonetheless,
if the two men are not gathering honey what are they doing? Any comments,
including from mountain climbers or rock climbers would be welcome.
If they were not gathering honey, then they were each other's honey! wahahahaha
ReplyDeleteThe honey gatherer: "I once remember an old lady who for the past twenty-five years was gathering honey to send to Ramana Maharshi. On every occasion she was unable to bring the honey herself and had to send it with someone. After waiting for twenty-five years, she finally found the opportunity to come. The old lady was in tattered clothes, standing before Ramana. Her eyesight was poor and I still vividly recall the unusual way she looked at Sri Bhagavan, calling out "Oh Darling, where are you? I want to see you." Bhagavan in all his graciousness said, "Grandmother, look this way. I am here." Looking at the honey she had brought with her, he said to me, "They are Brahmins, they won't eat this. We will share it, and eat it."
ReplyDeleteIt is often said, Ramana did not give direct Upadesa (spiritual teaching), but what else is all this? Although the Maharshi repeatedly pointed out human frailty, people were not prepared to rectify themselves. As if talking to himself, he looked at this poor old woman in ragged clothes and said, "Poor lady, she must be hungry. And where will she go for clothes? Who will offer her food and clothes?" Upon hearing this, a devotee got up and said, "We will give her food and also see that some clothes are purchased." Then they took the woman to the Dining Hall and fed her sumptuously. He also sent someone to town to buy her a sari. As the old woman had no money, she had walked a great distance to come here. Ramana knowing this, said in an impersonal way, "Would anyone be interested in getting her a bus ticket?" A devotee again came forward and said, "We will provide her with a bus ticket and see her off." When this lady returned from the Dining Hall she was touching the ground, and then touching her eyes. That is a way of prostration and thanksgiving.
It is noteworthy that whenever the poor or untouchables came, Ramana took a very personal interest in them, which was a moving sight to see"
An interesting read, Bhante. Here in Austria, there is a town called Hallstatt built on the side of a mountain where they have been mining salt for up to 7000 years. 7000 years ago people where scaling the mountain and burrowing deep into it's interior to gather the salt rocks. I suppose they too must have used ropes and such to use for "rock climbing" and "caving". They might have even used some of those rivers and waterfalls for a bit of "canyoning" too!
ReplyDeleteDo we know what happened to that unfortunate elephant?
ReplyDeleteDear PeterAtLarge,
ReplyDeleteThe elephant (the Bodhisattva) allowed his tusks to be cut off but perished soon afterwards of his wounds, the queen got her tusks but then died of remorse on hearing of the elephant death, and of the hunter’s fate we hear nothing. The commentary says the hunter became Devadatta in a later life.
Couldn't we suppose that the carving referred to something that would have been familiar at the time? There is a "portrait" of King Ashoka himself on an elephant holding relics on the Bharhut railings in the Indian Museum, so this might be a shared story from the period which we have no other knowledge of.
ReplyDelete