To talk (katha) is to articulate words and to listen (nisameti or sussusati) is
to attend to words being spoken. A combination of talking and listening is the
most common form of human communication and, therefore, is of great importance
in human relations. Refusing to talk with someone, not making oneself clear
when talking to them, or not listening to them when they are trying to explain
themselves, are the cause of innumerable problems between people. If we talk to
others and listen when they talk, we create the possibility of mutual sympathy,
understanding and tolerance.
The Buddha's concept of Right Speech (samma vaca) pertains mainly to the ethical
dimensions of speech, to what we talk about. But the Buddha was also
concerned with how we talk, with those qualities that can make our words
a positive and effective means of communication. The Buddha always talked in a
way that was `serious and beneficial for opening the mind' (katha abhisallekhika cetovivaranasappaya, A.V,67), and he asked
his disciples to talk without ambling (na
byadhayati) or hesitating (asandittham), in a gentle tone (sanha) and to use `language that is
polished, clear, free-flowing, meaningful, comprehensive and unbiased'
(A.II,51; V,81). Talking in such a manner makes ordinary social interactions
more pleasant and harmonious, and teaching the Dhamma in such a way makes it
more attractive and convincing.
However, not all eloquence is positive.
Some people combine their rhetorical skills with clever arguments and a loud
voice to dominate every conversation and stifle every point of view but their
own. In the religious debates at the time of the Buddha, some speakers could
`counter and crush true speech with false speech so that the audience gets
excited and shouts “A sage indeed! A real sage!”.’(A.V,230). Saying something
simply, sincerely and in a gentle measured voice can sometimes be more
effective than sophisticated delivery.
Perhaps the biggest obstacle to effective
verbal communication is talking too much, of being `so talkative and
long-winded that no one else has a chance to say anything' (Ja.I.418). This
unattractive habit has its roots in narcissism, a lack of awareness of others,
or being too attached to one's opinion. The Buddha often praised those who were
`easy to talk to' (suvaca, A.V,81), a
quality that requires a person to be approachable, friendly and to let others
know that he or she is interested in them and what they have to say. It also
requires punctuating one's conversation with pauses that allow others to
express their ideas, to consider what is being said or to ask questions.
Talking all the time or for too long is a form of selfishness, while being easy
to talk to shows respect, generosity and courtesy towards others. Perhaps it is
not surprising, therefore, that the Buddha saw being easy to talk to as an
expression of love (Sn.143).
But for communication
to take place it is not just enough to let others talk, we have to genuinely
listen to them when they do. Sometimes, when others are talking, we affect an
expression of interest although we are not really listening to them but only
waiting for an opportunity to interrupt them so we can say what we want. To
genuinely listen, we have to close our mouths and open our minds so that the other
person's words are not just heard but comprehended. Being a good listener helps
us understand people and it also helps us understand ideas. The Buddha knew
that listening is an important factor in education. He said: `There are five
advantages of listening to the Dhamma. What five? One hears things not heard
before, clarifies things heard before, dispels doubts, straightens one's ideas
and one's mind is delighted' (A.III,248). Before teaching the Dhamma, the
Buddha would often say to his audience `listen carefully, pay attention and I
will speak' (sunahi sadhukam manasikarohi,
A.V,302).
I just found your blog and I really like it. I am a Christian but in recent years I've become fascinated by the concepts and beliefs of Buddhism. I don't know very much, but it expands my view of life and myself.
ReplyDelete