Friday, December 11, 2015

Women In Buddhism


Until fairly recently almost all societies considered women to be inferior to men. This lower status was reflected in the teachings of most religions as well.  The Bible hold women responsible for the fall of humankind (1 Timothy 2,11-15) and the pain of childbirth  was seen as divine punishment on women for this offence (Genesis 3,16). Confucianism taught that women should live by what was called `the three subordinations', i.e. being subordinate to their father before marriage, to their husband after marriage, and to their oldest son when they become a widow. Men whose wife had died were encouraged to remarry but widows were forbidden to do so. One of the two branches of Jainism, the Digambras, believe that a women must be reborn as a male in order to attain enlightenment.  Apparently this notion is a later development and was not taught by Mahavira, the founder of Jainism. According to the Hinduism's Manusmrti women are to be honored but kept subservient in every way. They were not allowed to read the Vedas, the sacred scriptures. Although the Manusmrti's authority was not universally accepted and even those who did accept it did not necessarily follow all its strictures, its influence on the Indian attitude to women has been profound. One of the few religions that  from its inception considered   women to be equal with men   is Baha’i, which is particularly significant given that this religion had its origins in 19th century  Persia.  
At the time of the Buddha Indian women had considerably more freedom than in later centuries and there is little evidence that purdah, widow burning, female infanticide or child marriage had become the norm, as they did in later centuries. Widows could re-marry, although a collection of verses in the Jataka show that they were starting to be looked upon with contempt (Ja.VI,508), an attitude that later led to enforced widowhood. The verses express great sympathy for the widow's predicament showing that Buddhists did not approve of it.   
 The main criticism of the Buddha's attitude to women are the ideas attributed to him that; (1) a woman cannot become a Fully Perfected Buddha (samma sambuddha, M.III,65), and (2) that nuns must abide by eight special rules (atta garudhamma) that makes them inferior to monks (Vin.II,254). Concerning this first idea, the appearance of a Fully Perfected Buddha is an event so rare, only occurring once in many eons, that the chances of anyone, whatever their gender, becoming one are extremely remote. This being  the case the objection would seem to be moot.
The eight special rules incumbent on nuns give them a second place to monks and in several matters make them dependent on monks. This would have been uncontroversial during the Buddha's time although it does not accord with modern ideas of gender equality.  Today numerous Vinaya rules are disregarded because they are irrelevant  or at odds with modern norms and the eight special rules would be an example of this and thus need not be adhered to.  The other text that always gets a mention when the Buddhist attitude to women  is being discussed is the Kunala Jataka. To say that this  tale is outrageously misogynistic is an understatement. It accuses women of a broad range of vices.  But in doing so it is also more than a little hypocritical given that other Jataka stories depict males as guilty of murder, theft, scheming, skullduggery, treachery ingratitude, avariciousness, stupidity and a few other vices we don’t have words for. The only consolation is to keep in mind that the Jataka was not taught by the Buddha and clearly post-dates the  suttas by several centuries.  
The Buddha seems to have had an ambiguous attitude towards women, sometimes praising them, at other times disparaging them.  However, concerning the essentials of the Dhamma, he asserted that there is no significant differences between women and men. He said: `Having gone forth from home into homelessness in this Dhamma and training taught by the Tathagata, women are able to realize enlightenment and the stages leading up to it' (Vin.II,254). And again: `Whether it be a man or a whether it be a woman, whoever travels in the Chariot of Dhamma shall draw close to Nirvana' (S.I,33). The nun Soma  made the same point only perhaps more emphatically.  “A woman's nature is unimportant when the mind is still and firm, when knowledge grows day by day, and she has insight into Dhamma. One who thinks such thoughts as  I am a woman’ or I am a man’  or any other I am...’,  Mara is able to address that one”  (S.I,129). The Buddha said that he expected all his disciples, including nuns and lay woman, to be `accomplished and well-trained, learned and erudite, knowers of the Dhamma, living by Dhamma and walking the path of Dhamma...  pass  on to others what they have received from their Teacher and teach it, proclaim it, establish it, explain it, promote it and clarify it... and  use it to refute false teachings and impart this wondrous Dhamma'(D.II,105). Some of the nuns in the scriptures are described as being learned (bahussuta), eloquent (bhanika), confident (visarada) and outstanding at teaching the Dhamma (pattha dhammam  katam  katum, Vin.IV,290).
The Dhammasaghani of the Abhidhamma Pitaka says that gender is a characteristic of matter (rupa) not of consciousness (citta, Dhs. 633-4), which certainly makes sense. Thus while the consciousness of a being who had a female body in this life would be the same as the consciousness in the next life even if it reanimated a male body.  

1 comment:

Unknown said...

Good exposition, Venerable.

I think it's misguided how some people make their gender such an important part of their identity.

I'm glad that in the Dhamma, unlike the world, I can think of it as an impersonal trait just like any other. It's tiresome to be.

Blessings.