data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9c1f/a9c1fffd735306961e9e9e3669ab381fc1d1a7d1" alt=""
While smoking has a very negative effect on the body, it has little or no effect on consciousness and thus, from the Buddhist perspective, has no moral significance. A person can be kind, generous and honest and yet smoke like a chimney. Thus, although smoking is inadvisable from the point of view of physical health it is not contrary to the fifth Precept.
Smoking is very common in all Buddhists lands although in 2005 Bhutan was the first country in the world to ban it. In Burma, Thailand and Cambodia monks commonly smoke and in fact often start even before their teens. Go to a dana in any of these countries and the ‘requisites’ often include packets of cigarettes and in Burma, cigars. Statistics released in 2001 in Thailand showed that smoking-related diseases were the single biggest cause of death amongst monks. It is considered unacceptable in Sri Lanka for monks to smoke but smoking in private is common. Strangely enough, while Sri Lankan lay people would be scandalized by a monk smoking they consider it perfectly alright to offer them chewing tobacco.
Chewing betel, betel nut and betel leaf (Pali tambula) are not mentioned anywhere in the Tipitaka. They are not mentioned by Panini, in the early Upanisads, the Mahabharata or the Ramayana either. The only explanation for this silence is that betel chewing had not been introduced (from South India or South-east Asia?) at the time these books were composed. Soon after the nut was introduced into India its use became widespread within a very short time. It even took on an erotic aspect. A young woman’s lips stained red with betel juice was a turn-on for Indian men. Vatsyayana suggests spitting the betel juice you’re mouth into your lovers mouth as a part of love play. God! How tastes change! Today, chewing betel is common throughout South and South-east Asia, southern China and Taiwan. Monks in Sri Lanka, Burma, Thailand, Cambodia and Laos often chew it and I s
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a94fd/a94fd08abeda4ccb3d08a05998090cf4f1006ee2" alt=""
While thoughtful and aware people everywhere are increasingly moving away from tobacco and betel chewing, high percentages of monks just continue as before. Abbots don’t seem particularly worried that their smoking sets a bad example for young novices or the lay community. The general ignorance amongst them and their indifference to health issues, indeed most issues, means that smoking and betel chewing will probably remain a part of monastic culture for the foreseeable future.
5 comments:
Bhante,
So does the fifth precept literally refer to alcoholism?
so substance-abuse was a latter add-on to the precept? If so, what is the rationale behind it?
Dear Yamizi,
Taking alcohol or any mind-altering drugs is against the Precepts. I do not say or imply that the fifth Precept was an 'add-o.'As my blog post makes clear (at least I thought I had made it clear until I read your comment), smoking and chewing betel would not come under the fifth Precept because they have almost no effect on the mind. However, smoking and betel chewing show a disregard for health and disrespect towards the body and thus are inadvisable.
Dear Bhante,
How about mind-altering computer games that some teenagers have grown overly-obsessed with?
Bhante,
I think in this day and age, monks should set good examples for not smoking. I, for one is not attracted to monks who smoke.
(During one of your talks, you mentioned that Chief Rev smoked. I never saw him smoked and that came as a shock!)
"Literary sources, however, point to an Indian origin. A Pali text of 504 BC mentions betel."
http://rooneyarchive.net/lectures/lec_betel_chewing_in_south-east_asia.htm
Post a Comment